Home | News | Policy Statements | COFIR Responds to Secretary Paulson's "Financial Blueprint"

 

Coalition Responds to Secretary Paulson's "Financial Blueprint"

 
               Responding to the Treasury Departments recent release of its financial blueprint for
 regulatory reform, Greg Wren, Executive Director of the Coalition Opposed to a Federal
 Insurance Regulator (COFIR), stated, “The U.S. insurance industry remains vibrant and
 robust as insurance companies, both foreign and domestic, introduce innovative insurance 
 products through streamlined state regulatory structures designed to provide insurance and
 financial services products necessary to meet the dynamic needs of U.S. consumers.”
 
 The Department of the Treasury’s “Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulator 
 Structure” supports federal legislation known as optional federal charter (OFC) which would
 create an Office of National Insurance (ONI) within Treasury to build a federal insurance 
regulatory regime for insurers which opt for a federal insurance charter. Treasury Secretary
 Paulson believes the Office of National Insurance would not only regulate federally chartered
 insurers, but "should also include authority to license and oversee insurers which 
are state chartered." 
 
               In response, COFIR Executive Director Greg Wren stated, “Members of the U.S. Senate 
and House, governors, state legislators, attorneys general, and most importantly, American 
consumers, should be concerned over this statement which conjures up the ‘slippery slope’ of 
ultimate federal intervention against state charted insurers.”     “COFIR  opposes the creatio of
 a federal insurance regulator through an optional  federal charter, and will actively engage in
 supporting  legislative efforts to modernize our state-based system through targeted  insurance 
reforms necessary for protecting consumers and enhancing the  market-place opportunities for
 the insurance industry,” Wren stated.
 
            The insurance industry is sharply divided on the issue of a federal insurance regulator. Proponents would lead you to believe that the industry comes as a united front when, in fact, many associations and companies—and a clear majority of consumers – do not agree with efforts to create a massive new federal bureaucracy far removed from the states and from consumers.   COFIR has surveyed over 400,000 American households in 196 Congressional Districts with state-by-state and national results indicating an overwhelming opposition to a federal insurance regulator proposed under optional federal charter legislation. An OFC will be ‘optional’ for insurance companies but not for U.S. consumers.
 
               The Coalition Opposed to a Federal Insurance Regulator is a fast-growing coalition
 of insurance companies and trade associations which oppose federal efforts to create a dual, 
bifurcated system of state and federal insurance laws and regulations.